What made us human? Part of the answer may rest on the shoulders of a 3.3-million-year-old toddler.
Like “Lucy”—and unlike older, tree-based early human ancestors—the fossil child was a member of the species Australopithecus afarensis, pioneers of upright walking. Yet her apelike shoulder blades hint that our forebears may have taken longer than we thought to fully come down to earth, a new study says.
Figuring out when the tree-to-ground transition took place is immensely important to understanding how we became who we are. Bipedalism, after all, gave prehumans a literal head’s-up on approaching predators and freed up hands for stone tools, which in turn gave access to more types of food, including brain-boosting animal proteins—among other advantages.
Archaeological News: "Lucy's Baby" a Born Climber, Hinting Human Ancestors Lingered in Trees
crownedrose: mothernaturenetwork: Dinosaurs grew attractive...

Dinosaurs grew attractive feathers to entice potential lovers
New fossil found in Canada suggests that early feathered dinosaurs may have used their colorful feathers to woo potential mates.
Archaeological News: Bronze Age Golden Cup Unearthed in Italy
Archaeologists have dated a rare golden cup uearthed near the town of Montecchio Emilia in Northern Italy to about 1800 B.C., making it one of only three other similar golden cups discovered in Europe and Britain that have intrigued archaeologists and historians for years.
The cup turned up during a survey of a gravel pit located along terraces adjacent to the Enza River. Previous surveys in nearby areas also revealed evidence of dwellings of the late-Neolithic and Bronze Ages (IV-III millennium B.C), terramara cremation urns from the mid-recent Bronze Age (XIV-XII centuries B.C.), and Etruscan graves.
A recent report stated that “It had clearly been lifted up and partially moved by the plough quite some time ago.
Archaeological News: Penis-Shaped Bone & Lover's Bust Among Trove of Roman Art
Amateurs using metal detectors have discovered a trove of Roman artifacts, including a bust possibly depicting a male lover of a Roman emperor, a silver and gold brooch of a leaping dolphin and a penis-shaped animal bone.
Amateurs using metal detectors have discovered a trove of Roman artifacts, including a bust possibly depicting a male lover of a Roman emperor, a silver and gold brooch of a leaping dolphin and a penis-shaped animal bone.
The wide array of art, found across Britain, dates back about 1,600 to 2,000 years, when the Romans ruled the island.
This art is among almost 25,000 Roman artifacts (the bulk of them coins) reported in England and Wales in 2011. They were documented as part of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) and published recently in the journal Britannia.
theparisreview: What We’re Loving: A late-night note-to-self...

A late-night note-to-self scribbled on the flyleaf of Rosemarie Hill’s Stonehenge: “Why are you enraged by the idea of progress?” This short work of intellectual history—tracing theories of the megaliths from the seventeenth century to Spinal Tap—will have you reaching for the pencil on your own nightstand. It goes to the heart of English archaeology, architecture, religion, poetry, and politics, and is a record of follies in both senses of the word, as a cast of eccentrics and savants struggle with the evidence of deep human time. By the end of the book, Stonehenge is more mysterious than ever, and so are the people who built it. In the words of David St. Hubbins, “No one knows who they were … or what they were doing.” —Lorin Stein
lascauxx: Europe in the Later Paleolithic Age. A map showing...

Europe in the Later Paleolithic Age.
A map showing the possible outline of Europe and West Asia during the Later Paleolithic Age, about 35,000 to 25,000 years ago. . The map shows the present coastal outline in dashed lines, and is keyed to show the supposed areas of water, high lands, and very high mountains during the ice period, and shows the limits of glacial conditions (receding), the steppes, marsh lands, frozen lands, and direction of advancing forests. The Mediterranean basin is shown as two separate bodies of water not attached to the Atlantic, the region of remnant glaciers in Scandinavia, and the returning sea in the North Sea basin.
archaicwonder: New archaeological site - Alexander the Great ...

New archaeological site - Alexander the Great
180 Degree view of the Gilgit Valley from Gakoch Carved Rocks. The hill is situated at the altitude of 3500 meters. This site had never been explored until an English lady in July 2005, Alice hiked to this place and started working on it for the first time. It is said that the carved rocks were made by the great army of Alexander the Great starting from the Swat Valley up to Gilgit Baltistan. These places are full of unseen archeological sites which are never explored before. Alexander the Great entered the region around 327 B.C. E. crossing the Hindu Kush Range South of the Pamir, conquering areas of upper and lower Swat, entered the area covered by the Indus, marching across to Hund which was the seat of trade and commerce on the bank of the River Indus.
Alexander then marched on to the plains covered by the River Jhelum where the battle with a defeated Raja Porus at the Salt Range near Jalalapur was made famous by Alexander offer to spare Raja Porus life on being told that the vanquished wished to be “treated as one king would do to another king”. He then routed his journey again along the Indus, and finally returned by marching across Makran Desert to the coast on the Arabian Sea where he picked up vessels for his return to Macedonia.
Archaeological News: What Makes Us Human? Cooking, Study Says
Did you eat a hot meal today? It’s a smart thing to do, as our ancestors learned.
According to a new study, a surge in human brain size that occurred roughly 1.8 million years ago can be directly linked to the innovation of cooking.
Homo erectus, considered the first modern human species, learned to cook and doubled its brain size over the course of 600,000 years. Similar size primates—gorillas, chimpanzees, and other great apes, all of which subsisted on a diet of raw foods—did not.
“Much more than harnessing fire, what truly allowed us to become human was using fire for cooking,” said study co-author Suzana Herculano-Houzel, a neuroscientist at the Institute of Biomedical Sciences at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil.
This goes along greatly with one of my more recent blog posts about Fire, Cooking, and Growing the Human Brain- http://gwebarchaeology.tumblr.com/post/32621813587/fire-cooking-growing-the-human-brain
As well as another, “The Neaanderthal in my Family Tree” Article I shared- http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_evolution/2012/10/neanderthal_and_denisovan_genetics_human_ancestors_interbred_with_extinct.html
archaeologicalperiodical: The church of Santa Maria della...



The church of Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini in Rome , decorated by the friars with the bones of their deceased brothers between 1528 and 1870, CE.
ancientart: Both are paintings on ceramic tile from the Chinese...

Both are paintings on ceramic tile from the Chinese Han Dynasty (202 BCE – 220 CE); these figures, cloaked in Han Chinese robes, represent guardian spirits of certain divisions of day and night.
On the left is the guardian of midnight (from 11pm-1am) and on the right is the guardian of morning (from 5-7am).
Currently located at the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh.
Humans vs. Neanderthals - Who Would Win? Archaeologists Weigh In...
Humans vs. Neanderthals - Who Would Win? Archaeologists Weigh In (by TheYoungTurks)
“A team of archaeologists, paleoanthropologists, and paleoartists has created a more accurate Neanderthal reconstruction, based on a nearly completeskeleton discovered in France more than 100 years ago. The La Ferrassie Neanderthal man was short but stocky. If a modern man came nose-to-nose with a Neanderthal, could he take him in a fight?
Who would win in a fistfight between a modern human and a Neanderthal?
Without a big advance in genetics technology, it’s not a fight that’s going to ever happen, but if it could— and it probably once did— who would win in a one-on-one weapons-free brawl between a Neanderthal and a Homo sapien? The Neanderthal has the definite weight and strength advantage, but humans have more endurance, are quicker and are smarter. It’s like a classic brains vs brawn comic book brawl…
deconversionmovement: Lucy and Selam’s Species Climbed Trees:...

Lucy and Selam’s Species Climbed Trees: Australopithecus Afarensis Shoulder Blades Show Partially Arboreal Lifestyle
ScienceDaily (Oct. 25, 2012) — Australopithecus afarensis (the species of the well-known “Lucy” skeleton) was an upright walking species, but the question of whether it also spent much of its time in trees has been the subject of much debate, partly because a complete set of A. afarensis shoulder blades has never before been available for study.
ancientpeoples: Terracotta Doll Corinthian, found in...

Terracotta Doll
Corinthian, found in Athens
c.450 BCE
A terracotta doll representing a ‘Pyrrhic Dancer’ in helmet and cuirass.
Height: 15.5 cm
(Source: The British Museum)
Photo

sci-fact: There is significantly more genetic variability in...

There is significantly more genetic variability in one band of 50 chimpanzees than there is in the entire human species. This is no where near compatible with the age of the species, suggesting that at some point in history, at least once, the human population was almost entirely wiped out. The leading theory suggests that this evolutionary bottleneck may be directly linked to the catastrophic eruption of the Toba supervolcano in present day Indonesia about 70,000 years ago, which plunged the planet into a decade-long volcanic winter. This event was thought to have reduced the population of the ancestors of the current human species to between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals in central Africa. It has been shown conclusively that all humans alive today descend from that single homogeneous ancestral population.
I Like Anthropology: “I‘m Samuel Zaber, a...

I Like Anthropology:
“I‘m Samuel Zaber, a Classics/Anthropology major at the University of Vermont. This blog was originally set up to help with my research project for a Cultural Anthro. class (The culture of the Sherlock fandom on Tumlbr!) but now I just want an Anthropology blog.”
Here is the link to the blog: http://anthropologymydearwatson.tumblr.com/
flarechaser: One afternoon while I was rambling on and on about...

One afternoon while I was rambling on and on about why archaeologists are particularly well-adapted to post-apocalyptic situations, I started to describe the general mechanics and uses of an atlatl. (In the event of a zombie apocalypse, it would be my weapon of choice, as the weapon itself and the ammunition are very easily made [well, ok, easily made by someone who knows where to get the materials].)
One wouldn’t think a seven foot long dart would be a very accurate weapon, especially when used in conjunction with a weird lever thing, but I’ve heard the stories, and I’ve seen the pictures, and these suckers could pack a wallop.
Easy pronunciation - AT - LAT - UL like you’re saying the end of “little.” The guy who taught my class to use them has a fish tale about atlatl use that I’m more than a little inclined to believe - he once skewered a carp as it leaped out of the water.
They were also pretty much used everywhere and predate the bow and arrow. The projectile points that people tend to find synonymous with prehistory were probably used for atlatls and not arrows. It makes sense, if you’ve ever held a dart point in one hand and an arrow point in the other - arrow points are pretty tiny, especially compared to dart points, and if you tried to stick a four or five inch point on a two and a half foot arrow, it probably wouldn’t go very far. Rocks are heavy, yo.
It’s one reason, among others, that projectile points aren’t referred to as arrowheads anymore. I probably shouldn’t even be calling them projectile points, because there’s really no way to know if the bifacially flaked diagnostic stone tools were even used as projectiles. Many of them just as likely spent their use lives as knives, scrapers, or ceremonial possessions.
Overall, the atlatl darts are pretty much the same as an arrow. They have the basic point, shaft, and fletching, though the nock is usually a depression that will sit on the spur at the butt-end of the atlatl. The difference is mostly in scale. Atlatl darts are usually somewhere around six or seven feet in length.
The atlatl itself can have a couple different forms, but most will be a length of wood, bone, or antler about the length of the arm or a little longer. At the butt-end will be the spur that the butt of the arrow will sit on. Sometimes a weight will be placed toward the middle to give a little more power to the throw. At the front, either a y-shaped cut or a groove holds the dart in place along the shaft as the thrower prepares the swing.
The physics of it are complex and I’m sure very fun for people who like physics, but the moral of the story is this: the atlatl just makes your arm longer. Since the arm is longer, the swing to throw the dart is longer, and there is more force behind the throw. It’s basically like winding up for a pitch - there’s a difference in the power of the throw if you wind up or if you just sort of lob the ball with half your arm.
So that might have been a long, convoluted, and over-thought explanation for why the atlatl is my weapon of choice in case of zombies. There are other benefits - like not having to learn how to use the bow and arrow and put up with those pesky armguards, right Hawkeye…
Photo








